Latest Updates: criza RSS

  • Robert ZANESCU

    Business Magazin: Ieftin - marile costuri ale pretului mic

    Robert ZANESCU 14:24 on June 7, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , criza, , , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    Cover Story in numarul de azi, 7 Iunie 2010, al Business Magazin: "Ieftin - marile costuri ale pretului mic"

    “Din ruinele consumismului de pana mai ieri si cumpatarea de astazi, se naste noua clasa de mijloc a lumii”. O ipoteza ce are sanse mari sa devina concluzie,  in numarul de azi al Business Magazin (cover story-ul “Ieftin – marile costuri ale pretului mic”).

    Mi-a atras atentia declaratia in context a lui Albert Davidoglu, Customer Development Director al Unilever: ofertele de produse cu preturi reduse la care recurg comerciantii din ce in ce mai des este o miscare gresita, care va duce la distrugerea pietelor, a caror valoare deja scade masiv.

    Blog post-ul meu din 27 Aprilie, “Nimeni nu castiga de pe urma promotiilor speciale” subliniaza acest aspect:

    “Problema este ca in prezent consumatorul oscileaza intre branduri in functie de promotia pe care acestea o au la raft. Pe termen scurt castiga retelele de magazine, insa o data ce producatorii/distribuitorii constata ca vanzarile lor revin invariabil al acelasi nivel avut inaintea promotiei, apetitul lor pentru activitati ce cresc cota de piata pe termen scurt si care erodeaza nu numai profitul dar si brand equity-ul va scadea semnificativ. Oricata presiune ar avea acestia de la HQ pentru cota de piata, pana la urma profitabilitatea isi va lua partea. [...] atentie la planificarea pe termen scurt. Exista afaceri si dupa criza, iar razboiul este castigat nu de catre cel care castiga fiecare batalie, ci de catre cel care castiga bataliile decisive.”

    Cheia este in opinia mea in regandirea intregului Supply Chain, coroborat cu redimensionarea organizationala in jurul unei culturi orientata catre oameni, nu catre sarcini.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    40 € discount

    Robert ZANESCU 00:41 on June 7, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , criza, , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    Business Review – the leader on the local English language business publications market

    Pentru cei care vor sa participe la workshopurile prezentate in blog post-urile din 1 Iunie si 2 Iunie pe http://www.zanescu.ro/blog, Business Review ofera un discount de 40 de EURO la valoarea listata pe site-ul lor. Click pe linkul urmator, in pagina Register, si introduceti in campul “Discount code” textul Robert Zanescu. Asfel, oricare a fost optiunea marcata in campurile de inregistrare:

    “I want to attend Beat the Recession, Beat the competion – Global Best Practices in Sales Management for 190 EUR + VAT”,

    “I want to attend The Latest in Channel Innovation for 190 EUR + VAT”,

    “I want to attend both events for 330 EUR +VAT,

    costul participarii va fi mai mic cu 40 de EURO (sistemul va calcula pretul final tinand cont de aceasta oferta speciala pentru cititorii http://www.zanescu.ro/blog).

    Profita chiar acum de discount-ul de 40 de EURO. Numai pentru cititorii http://www.zanescu.ro/blog!

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Beneficiarul principal al crizei din Romania: consumatorul

    Robert ZANESCU 13:01 on June 6, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , crestere, criza, sustenabil

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    Pe cat de ireal suna acest titlu, pe atat de adevarat este. Si de aceea, repet: beneficiarul principal al crizei din Romania este consumatorul. Asta este vestea buna. Vestea proasta vine acum: beneficiile se vor simti intr-un spectru de timp situat intre 12 si 18 luni. (More …)

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Interviu cu Sandy Vaci, Adjunct Senior Professor la CEU Business School - partea a doua

    Robert ZANESCU 09:03 on June 2, 2010 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , criza, , , , , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    “why do so many managers readily blame people when things go wrong, instead of looking at the circumstances that could have caused it?” – Sandy Vaci.

    Acest post este o continuare a interviului realizat cu Sandy Vaci, Adjunct Senior Professor la CEU Business School. In prima parte, publicata ieri, am discutat despre schimbarile pe care trebuie sa le facem pentru a evita greselile dinainte de criza, despre nevoile reale ale consumatorilor si despre simt de afaceri.

    In randurile urmatoare, ultima parte a interviului realizat cu Sandy.

    Robert Zanescu: Which was in your view a great sales experience that you’ve noticed recently (being exposed to personally or noticed in your research work)? Can you elaborate on the reasons why do you believe it was a great sales experience?

    Sandy Vaci: It happened a few weeks ago at the Bucharest Marriott and was delivered by a person called Dan Martinas. (They are not paying me to say this, I actually collect and document these experiences so I can use them as examples!)

    I arrived late and needed to make some small changes to my presentation for next morning. I stay at the hotel often, so Dan offered me free use of a PC in their Business Centre. This was already a nice touch – they acknowledged and thanked me for my patronage this way.

    But the PC I got at the Centre did not work. Dan came over and started up another one for me. That also did not work. Apparently, all the PCs in the Centre were out of commission, awaiting some system upgrade. Although it wasn’t his fault, Dan personally apologized for this as if it was. He then personally took me up to the Business Lounge (normally reserved for those who booked a suite) and asked the attendant there to give me free access to one of their PCs.

    Bad luck. All the PCs had the same problem there. Dan apologized again and offered help finding an internet café nearby to make my changes. He said he would have offered his personal laptop but didn’t take it to work. I told him not to worry, I make the changes in the office next morning and go and have a swim instead. Dan went away and within minutes a pair of slippers arrived in my room (for my trip to the pool), together with a free fruit basket and a personal note of apology from Dan, wishing me a good swim and a healthy snack after a healthy exercise.

    I felt… delight. Interesting, isn’t it? At the end, I could not do what I wanted to. But I had an incredibly positive experience. Dan did not blame others. He truly represented his company. He did everything he could to help. And he finished it of with a truly unexpected touch that went beyond customer satisfaction, to customer delight. This is what I call creating a differentiating EXPERIENCE.

    Now, you could say that this was service, not sales. But guess what? I return to Bucharest often for seminars, lectures, consulting. Different companies have contacts with different hotels. They would put me up at different places. With this single act Dan has bought my loyalty for years. I will always stay at the Marriott. I said earlier “sales is a higher level of service”. It is also true in reverse: “excellent service is the best sales there is!”

    Which are in your view the top 5 abilities/skills that a Transnational Sales Manager should have?

    First: Keeping a common sense towards people. Nobody gets up in the morning saying “I’ll go to work today to do a really bad job!” And nobody changes overnight. So why do so many managers readily blame people when things go wrong, instead of looking at the circumstances that could have caused it? Why do I hear so often “oh, yes, he (or she) used to be really good but he changed”? A manager’s job is to both ENABLE and motivate their people to greatness. Let’s look at ourselves first, what we could have done to create a winning environment before we lay the blame elsewhere.

    Second: Ability to plan and measure activities and efficiencies which will lead to sales or profit, instead of measuring only profit or sales itself. We need to plan our way to success. We should not drive looking in the rearview mirror. Looking forward means managing the activities that will generate results. Tracking results alone is looking backwards. By the time I get the results there is nothing I can do to change them!

    Third: Being “3-D”. I don’t mean being three dimensional. I mean knowing when to Delegate, when to Discuss and when to Decide. The worst decision is not making one, and not allowing others to make it either. This is even more important, and even more difficult, when managing across cultures. A real challenge for transnational managers!

    Fourth: Having a good balance of creativity and discipline.

    Fifth: Having humor and humility.

    What about the Marketing Manager? Could you please enumerate the top 5 abilities/skills that a Marketing Manager should develop in order to keep up with a Transnational Sales Manager?

    It’s probably too easy to say that they should have pretty much the same skills… So let me add two more. Then you can pick three you liked from the previous one and add these two to get to the magic five!

    One: Ability to see marketing and sales as part of a continuum, not as separate disciplines.

    Two: Willingness to understand the sales processes at work. This will allow the marketer to design better tools for the sales people, to treat every sales or service interaction as a marketing opportunity. A wonderful example comes to mind here. Back in Canada we wanted to get bank tellers (those employees who do cashier and transactional activities) involved in a retirement investment campaign. It was difficult. Their focus was reactive, to do what the customer wanted. Do it fast, do it well, don’t keep anyone waiting.

    The solution came from one of our colleagues, who spent some of his time in branches and observed how things work in detail. Based on his suggestions we put a glass jar, full of $1 coins in front of every teller, on the customers’ side. There was a sign on it, facing the customer: “Take a coin if I did NOT ask you about our latest retirement savings options!” Then we told all our tellers that whatever money was left in their jar at the end of the campaign was theirs.

    You should have seen the enthusiasm this generated. We had thousands of instant sales people, proactively asking every customer if they were willing to discuss their retirement needs with us. This kind of insight only comes from willingness to observe and understand how other areas do their work – then using the knowledge gained, creatively.

    On that note, I guess I should add a third point after all: “of course, you should practice the above two skills while keeping your marketing mindset and professionalism”!

    It was long said, “money makes the world go round”. If you were to find a replacement for this, what would you say for the post-crisis period?

    I honestly don’t think it will change. And there is nothing wrong with that. Money does make the world go round. It is the oil in the engine. Problems happen when we focus so much on the oil that we forget it is only there to make the engine work. If you take the oil out, the engine will stop. But what do you do with a bucketful of oil if you no longer have a working engine to pour it into? All I would ask for is: PLEASE REMEMBER THE ENGINE!

    Thank you Sandy for your time and looking forward to the workshops in Bucharest.


    Sandy Vaci – Adjunct Senior Professor la CEU Business School (MBA Studies)

    Despre Sandy Vaci

    Sandy este in prezent Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Credit Bank of Moscow si Partener la Leaders’ Den – o companie globala de consultanta cu sediul central in Marea Britanie.  A publicat doua carti despre practici globale in domeniul vanzarilor la VRL. Un cetatean global, Sandy are ca baze ale activitatilor sale Toronto, Vienna si Budapesta.

    Sandy va sustine in Bucuresti doua seminarii de vanzari in organizate de BUSINESS REVIEW.

    “Global best Practices in Sales Management” este un semniar dedicat practicilor internationale de management al vanzarilor, practici pe care oricine le poate utiliza pentru a se proteja de efectele recesiunii si pentru a se pregati pentru viitoarea crestere economica.

    “The Latest in Channel Innovation-  A Practical Guide” este continuarea seminarului “Global best Practices in Sales Management” si va face o trecere in revista a practicilor internationale privind “controlarea unei relatii” in contrast cu “controlarea de active” in scopul cresterii veniturilor cu costuri mici si flexibile.

    Mai multe despre seminariile pregatite de catre Sandy la Bucuresti pe site-ul BUSINESS REVIEW.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Interviu cu Sandy Vaci, Adjunct Senior Professor la CEU Business School

    Robert ZANESCU 13:04 on June 1, 2010 | 4 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , criza, ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5
    Sandy Vaci – Adjunct Senior Professor at CEU Business School (MBA Studies)

    Sandy Vaci – Adjunct Senior Professor at CEU Business School (MBA Studies)

    “I believe selling, when done right, is a higher level of service.” – Sandy Vaci.

    Cu cateva zile in urma am avut un blog post despre doua seminarii pregatite de catre Sandy Vaci, Adjunct Senior Professor la CEU Business School (MBA Studies): “Global Best Practices in Sales Management” (16 Iunie), siThe Latest in Channel Innovation -  A Practical Guide” (29 Iunie).

    In aceasta saptamana public o discutie avuta cu Sandy despre marketing, vanzari si despre customer experiences.

    Robert Zanescu: Sandy, we’ve met at Raiffeisen Bank (you contributed decisively to my hiring decision there as Marketing Director back in 2002, and I say thank you again for this). You were a top ranked Executive at Raiffeisen International, the owner of 15 network banks in Eastern Europe. Now, you became and “academic”. Knowing you as a man that seeks challenges, I cannot start by not asking, what challenges, what hurdles do you have in front of you in your new role?

    Sandy Vaci: Being an “academic” gives me wonderful challenges and opportunities in many areas. First, I can develop new managers and share my knowledge. This is something I always enjoyed doing in the “industry”. Second, I get to work with lots of interesting, different companies. I see interesting issues in different industries and work with different people to help solve them. Obviously, I could not do this while working for any specific company. Finally, I get a chance to “blow up management myths”. And without getting fired for it! There are so many fads going around at any given time. Being able to expose them, and learn from this, is great fun. Again, this is hard to do while working in the industry. Your boss may believe too strongly in them…

    As for the hurdles, the first one was getting accepted in academia, as someone coming from industry. Luckily, both CEU and MSM (Maastricht School of Management, just opening in Romania) decided to give me a chance. I owe them big thanks for that. The second hurdle is handling the academic bureaucracy which I am not used to. But it’s a small price to pay for doing something I really like.

    You are very active in many fields, you teach, you are playing a role in the management board of a bank, you write books. Do you have more than 24 hours in a day? How do you manage your time, is there life after work?

    It’s not as bad as it looks. I enjoy everything I do, so that makes it easier. And my board job is actually at the Supervisory board level, which is easier than a full time Management board job. All of that still leaves me time for my wife, for friends, concerts, hikes… and renovating our house. And I like to keep 25 to 30% of my time available for “last minute opportunities” like consulting requests, conference invitations and the like.

    My marketing mantra is: “marketing is selling to as many people, as frequent as possible, as profitable as possible” and as a marketeer, I do believe that nothing happens unless someday sells something to somebody. Sandy, your experience spreads over marketing and sales roles in companies that were and are very aggressive on the market. Your current class at CEU Business School is “Transnational Sales Force Management”. You run sales workshops. Our appetite for sales and our consumers delight in buying ended up in quasi-general consumption crisis. What changes should we do in our approach? What really went wrong? Shall we aim towards a transformation of consumers into shoppers (sell them more commodities, rather than brands)?

    Wow! That’s a lot of questions in one. Yes, I believe that there is a level of “over-consumption” in some parts of the world. But I think the current crisis is more of a financial one that ended up infecting “real industries” than anything else. And I have my own mantra for how it could be (or should have been?) dealt with.

    If someone is trying to sell me something complex I always need to understand it before I buy. If they cannot explain it in simple terms which I understand, I don’t buy. And I always want time to decide. If they push me to give an answer on the spot, my answer is always “no”. Think about it: would we have got into this mess if regulators and consumers had followed these rules when banks tried to sell them those overly complex financial deals that exploded later?

    Now, for sales. I believe selling, when done right, is a higher level of service. Good sales is not shoving down something someone’s throat that he doesn’t want. Good sales is understanding the person’s real needs and offering the best solutions for them. My belief is that the world is moving in the opposite direction of what you mentioned: away from selling commodities.

    There is a theory about “experience based economy” which says that we keep moving from “resources” to “goods” to “services” to “EXPERIENCE”. Think of cows as “resources”, a cut of meat as “goods”, the steak dinner at a restaurant as “service”. When a restaurant differentiates itself based on its ambience, based on how you feel there – that is creating an “experience”. As we move from the early resource based economies through goods to services and beyond, each new stage turns the offers of the previous ones into commodities. They are differentiated mostly on price, while I differentiate myself by better satisfying consumers’ real needs.

    So to me the challenge is to find out what experiences people want and REALLY target our efforts towards satisfying those. I believe this will be the real challenge for both marketers and sales professionals in the coming years. That is what being “consumer centric” should mean. Of course, smart businessmen (and women) will then try to build brands around these “experience offers” to give them a sustainable advantage. I see nothing wrong with that.

    Banking industry is among the most hurt ones in the current environment and retail sales have gone from bad to worse. Steven van Groningen, the CEO of Raiffesen Bank Romania says on his blog that “NO CONFIDENCE, NO BORROWING. Consumer confidence fell more in Romania than it did in the EU and other CEE countries. Not only did it fall more, it also remained lower for longer and is still low today.” What would you recommend to a retail bank sales force management to do in such harsh environment?

    First of all, understand and focus on the real needs of your customers and prospects. Try to address their needs, instead of feeling depressed because you are not allowed by your Credit department to sell them loans. For example, borrowing is one way to satisfy the need for decent housing by buying a new home. But you are not allowed to grant a large loan. So what about suggesting saving up for a larger downpayment? (And offering a savings product to do so.) Or renovating with a smaller renovation loan? How about taking a loan for a longer term with lower payments to make it more affordable, or actually suggesting that they borrow some of the money needed from family, so that the bank can give them the rest?

    Second, keep in contact with your best customers and continue to delight them with service. You need to preserve your ability to sell them something in the future. That means keeping their trust, staying top of mind for them.

    Third, try to make sure your bank helps them if they have credit problems. This is not simply being nice and being customer centric. It makes hard nosed business sense. Rule number one of cross selling is: “like to like”. Tobacco companies sell their brands to those who already smoke. Beer companies sell beer to those who are allowed to drink and already do so. Banks can only sell credit to those who are not afraid of it. If your customers have bad experiences with borrowing they will think very hard the next time before they ask for a loan. If you don’t help them today, you will lose them tomorrow.

    Continuarea interviului cu Sandy Vaci in blog post-ul de maine.


    Despre Sandy Vaci

    Sandy este in prezent Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Credit Bank of Moscow si Partener la Leaders’ Den – o companie globala de consultanta cu sediul central in Marea Britanie.  A publicat doua carti despre practici globale in domeniul vanzarilor la VRL. Un cetatean global, Sandy are ca baze ale activitatilor sale Toronto, Vienna si Budapesta.

    Mai multe despre seminariile pregatite de catre Sandy la Bucuresti pe site-ul Business Review.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Mesaj catre directorii generali: marketing in linia intai sau cum sa vinzi cat mai mult si sa faci si bani din asta.

    Robert ZANESCU 16:51 on May 15, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , criza, , , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    In vremuri tulburi, cand conditiile economice sunt incerte, prima masura aplicata de managerii unei companii este de a taia din costuri. Din tot, cate putin, sau mai mult. Atat timp cat taierea costurilor este pe buzele si pe agenda fiecarui membru al echipei de management si nu numai, lucrurile merg intr-o directie buna – aceasta este mantra repetata la nesfarsit de membrii marcanti ai consiliilor de administratie, oglindind perfect obsesiile CEO-ului.

    Putine companii au inteles ca banii vin nu din reducerea de costuri, ci de la clienti (pe termen scurt si lung). Ceea ce inseamna ca in linia intai trebuie sa fie departamentul de marketing si nu cel financiar. Departamentul financiar traieste si respira “trecutul” unei companii. Nu poti dezvolta o afacere, nu poti creste baza de clienti decit daca in transee se afla departamentul de marketing.

    Marketingul inseamna sa vinzi cat mai mult, la cat mai multi oameni, cat mai des posibil si cat mai profitabil. Multe organizatii, fie ele intreprinderi mici si mijlocii sau corporatii multinationale au uitat insa acest lucru si in goana lor pentru optimizarea de costuri au scapat mingea in afara terenului: actiunile lor de marketing seamana a exercitiu financiar facut intr-un colt de masa in Microsoft Excel.

    Traim o perioada pe care as denumi-o “perioada consumatorului constient”, constient din ce in ce mai mult de valoarea banilor sai si de ce inseamna viata sa cu adevarat. Avem de a face cu o schimbare a cadrului de referinta. Vorbim de o prioritizare mai buna, constienta, a atentiei pe care acest consumator o da informatiei despre produse primita din piata. Consumatorul nu mai cauta “afluenta aspirationala” ci vrea performanta. Si cel mai important: consumatorul nu vrea lucruri ieftine: vrea pret si calitate.

    Eliberati departamentul de marketing! Trimiteti-va oamenii de marketing in linia intai, aruncati-i in lupta! Este momentul pentru a intelege din nou ce inseamna valoare pentru consumator si nu doar preturi mici. Este momentul pentru face intreaga organizatie sa traiasca si sa vibreze la fiecare interactiune cu clientul. Este momentul in care marketingul trebuie activat 360. Investitia in marketing si in consumator este cea mai profitabila investitie pe termen scurt si lung si trebuie aplicata indiferent de ce se intampla in economie la un moment dat.

    Cum sa vinzi mai mult si cat mai profitabil cu putinta? Asigurati-va ca marketingul si echipa de marketing are un rol mai mult decat functional in companie. Asigurati-va ca actiunile de marketing nu au caracter sporadic, episodic ci sunt continue, integrate si foarte important, MASURATE.

    Atentie la joc. A inceput repriza a doua, si nu se joaca prelungiri.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Nimeni nu castiga de pe urma promotiilor speciale

    Robert ZANESCU 23:50 on April 27, 2010 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , criza, , , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    Deschide orice “trade magazine” iti pica in mana (Carrefour, Cora, Billa, etc.) si vei fi imediat invadat de oferte de tipul “2+1″, “1 si al doilea la jumatate de pret”, etc.

    Am facut recent o analiza a mesajelor transmise de revistele publicate de catre International Key Accounts (asa numitele “trade magazines”) si constat o tendinta catre comunicarea de pret minim. Lucru firesc, ai putea spune la prima vedere. Marile retele sunt interesate in a oferi valoare consumatorilor in vremuri de criza si fac asta prin oferte de pret atractive. Reversul medaliei: marile retele au ajuns sa vinda pana la 30% din rulajul lunar in promotie, ceea ce este de trei ori mai mult decat in mod obisnuit. Acest lucru genereaza efecte secundare grave pe termen lung, atat pentru retele cat si pentru producatori/distribuitori.

    In primul rand, retelele de magazine isi pierd pozitionarile de brand ajungand sa se lupte in zona cea mai periculoasa: pretul. Inteleg nevoia de a oferi valoare, insa ceea ce se intampla acum este pur si simplu o involutie. Timp de 20 de ani ne-am dorit branduri si am contribuit, pas cu pas, mai mult sau mai putin, fiecare dintre noi, la constructia de branduri. Intrand in acest razboi al preturilor, retelele de magazine cat si producatorii si distribuitorii duc brandurile periculos de mult in zona bunurilor generice. Consumatorul nu mai stie de ce sa revina (Cora), daca e vorba de o viata mai buna (Carrefour), sa vina zilnic (Billa) pentru ca este ieftin si bun (Kaufland) sau daca este in avantajul sau (Penny).

    In al doilea rand, ofertele speciale de tip “2+1″ imping consumatorul catre cumpararea unei cantitati mai mari de produs decat in mod obisnuit, acesta alocand resurse mai mari unor achizitii pe care ar trebui sa le faca, in special in aceste vremuri tulburi, cu mult mai multa chibzuinta. Stocarea unor cantitati mai mari decat uzual duce implicit la consum mai mare in gospodarie. Intr-adevar, acest lucru genereaza (cel putin ipotetic) o repetare a cumparaturii pentru produsul care satisface nevoia respectiva si care aduce valoare.

    Problema este ca in prezent consumatorul oscileaza intre branduri in functie de promotia pe care acestea o au la raft. Pe termen scurt castiga retelele de magazine, insa o data ce producatorii/distribuitorii constata ca vanzarile lor revin invariabil al acelasi nivel avut inaintea promotiei, apetitul lor pentru activitati ce cresc cota de piata pe termen scurt si care erodeaza nu numai profitul dar si brand equity-ul va scadea semnificativ. Oricata presiune ar avea acestia de la HQ pentru cota de piata, pana la urma profitabilitatea isi va lua partea.

    In concluzie, atentie la planificarea pe termen scurt. Exista afaceri si dupa criza, iar razboiul este castigat nu de catre cel care castiga fiecare batalie, ci de catre cel care castiga bataliile decisive.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Marketing 360: un eveniment despre consumatori, clienti si furnizori

    Robert ZANESCU 01:55 on November 20, 2009 | 2 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , criza, , , ,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    img_2530.jpg_450Mi-am petrecut ziua de 19 Noiembrie 2009 la Crowne Plaza la MARKETING 360, un eveniment organizat excelent de catre Evensys. S-a discutat despre marketing eficient in timp de criza, despre cum sa gandim strategia de marketing pentru 2010 si despre provocari si oportunitati in marketing si publicitate. Evenimentul a fost completat cu o sesiune despre solutii de marketing la viteza new media, iar cortina a cazut dupa o lupta in marketing arena, o secventa in care practicieni din publicitate au prezentat cate o idee proprie de marketing.

    Mi-a atras atentia in mod special prima sesiune, “Marketing eficient pe timp de criza”. Manuela Necula, Aneta Bogdan, Mihai Ghyka, Bogdan Naumovici si Shachar Shaine moderati de catre Cosmin Alexandru, au pledat pentru concentrarea atentiei, a tuturor eforturilor, pe viitor, pe ce este de facut dincolo de criza. Pe tonuri mai tari sau mai linistite, s-a afirmat ca avem de a face din pacate cu mult dilentantism atat in zona clientilor cat si a agentiilor de publicitate. Spun diletantism deoarece multi reprezentanti ai acestor doua categorii nu inteleg afacerea pe care o gestioneaza sau pentru care trebuie sa realizeze programe de publicitate. Nu inteleg impactul actiunilor lor pe intregul supply chain, nu inteleg implicatiile financiare. Bogdan Naumovici a vorbit despre cei 80 de oameni concediati de la Leo Burnett. Boom-ul economic a insemnat bani pe strada pe care trebuia sa-i ridice cineva. Au angajat prea multi oameni, pe salarii prea mari. Contributia lor la afacere a fost insa marginala si atunci cand nu au mai fost bani pe strada, acei oameni au trebuit sa plece. La fel se intampla si de partea clientului. Anteta Bogdan spunea ca lipsesc notiuni de baza, ca oamenii de marketing din prea multe companii sunt superficiali si slab pregatiti. Din pacate este adevarat. Asa cum in agentii au fost angajati media planneri cu 2000 de Euro pe luna (si asta dupa lungi negocieri), asa au aparut si la clienti Brand Manageri supra platiti si lipsiti de continut. Prea multi asa-zisi profesionisti, impostori ai boom-ului economic pun astazi catuse creativitatii in publicitate sau inovatiei in marketing, fie ea incrementala sau exponentiala. Atunci cand nici unii nici altii nu pot gandi mai departe de Gaia, Fratelli sau Bamboo suntem martorii revoltati ai unor campanii esuate pe rafturile unor magazine care si-au pierdut de mult ratiunea de a fi.

    Ne plangem ca ne-au scazut vanzarile, insa nu incercam sa gasim solutii specifice la probleme specifice: cum au evoluat vanzarile pe canale, pe tipuri de magazine, am mixul de produse care trebuie in functie de tipul de magazin? Stiu ce tip de consumator trebuie sa atac cu ce tip de media si cu ce context publicitar?

    Eu cred ca in 2010 ne vom trezi la realitate. Este anul scadentei. Este anul in care vom privi invidiosi cum cei din jurul nostru ies sau au iesit din criza, iar noi doar tragem linie si concluzionam. 2010 este anul cand fiecare dintre noi trebuie sa-si spuna: inainte de ma gandi la ce program imi fac diseara, ma gandesc cum sa-mi organizez ziua cel mai bine; vacanta mi-o programez nu dupa calendarul si ofertele agentiilor de turism ci dupa calendarul de marketing al companiei – daca este plin de evenimente, stam acasa, mergem in week-end pana la Snagov, in rest, 12 ore de munca cu gandul la brand, nu la Messenger sau facebook.

    La Marketing 360 am moderat sesiunea III – Provocari si oportunitati in marketing si publicitate. Serban Alexandrescu de la Headvertising, Razvan Matasel de la Arsenoaiei si Matasel, Sorin Psatta de la BBDO si Cosmin Alexandru de la Brandivia au subliniat multiplele probleme la nivel tehnic (competente) ale clientilor si agentiilor, dar si la nivelul modelului de business si al celui cultural al organizatiilor. Am retinut 7 puncte pricipale:

    - lipsa de diferentiere a agentilor de publicitate, toti fac cam acelasi lucru, la fel de bine, mediocru sau prost;

    - oportunism si impostura (client, dar si agentie);

    - oameni de marcom timorati sau complexati, oameni de marcom care fac exces de putere in relatia cu agentia si care dovedesc lipsa de putere in promovarea si aprobarea interna a ideilor;

    - prea multi oameni de afaceri in advertising pentru care profitul operational obtinut in industria de publicitate puteau sa-l obtina si in alta industrie (au venit in advertising din oportunitate de business, nu tocmai din pasiune);

    - calitatea “produsului” in publicitate este afectat fundamental de criza;

    - comunicarea agentie-client este rupta; clientii aleg sa lucreze cu agentii pe care le cunosc dupa ce au schimbat cu acestia trei email-uri si o prezentare dupa doua saptamani intr-un pitch.

    La Marketing 360 s-a discutat totusi nu numai despre probleme, dar si despre solutii.

    Eu am retinut doua, fundamentale: bun simt si simt de afaceri.

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    Ziarul Financiar: despre managerii "surferi"

    Robert ZANESCU 16:37 on November 2, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: cost-cutting, criza, delegare, manager, , rezultate, training

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    Un articol excelent din editia de azi a Ziarului Financiar: http://www.zf.ro/profesii/managerii-surferi-in-afara-de-cost-cutting-nu-stiu-sa-faca-nimic-sa-tai-costurile-in-criza-nu-este-management-este-bun-simt-5072341/

    Citeste si da mai departe!

     
  • Robert ZANESCU

    "how to spend it" sau angajamentul unui brand premium in vremuri de criza

    Robert ZANESCU 12:34 on October 4, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: audienta, , criza, , premium, presa,

    Rating 3.00 out of 5

    how to spend it home page

    Financial Times relanseaza astazi situl http://www.howtospendit.com. Este o miscare indrazneata, o investitie considerabila intr-un sit extraordinar.

    Design, navigare si o abordare creativa a publicitatii. Cei de la FT demonstreaza ca inteleg si indraznesc sa relanseze un brand premium intr-o perioada in dificila pentru consumator si pentru presa. FT integreaza inspirat experienta brandului off-line in on-line. Iar prezenta publicitatii in cantitate deloc neglijabila, cu mesaje bine tintite pentru audienta “How to Spend It” face ca experienta de utilizare a brandului publicatiei sa fie semnificativa si consistenta cu imaginea sa creata pana acum.

    FT's how to spend it

    Criza sau nu, un brand bine construit si o echipa solida de marketing in spatele lui inseamna angajament si determinare pentru consumator si pentru piata.

    Presa scrisa si on-line, industria auto si real-estate-ul sunt zonele care au simtit din plin miscarea placilor tectonice din comportamentul consumatorului. A te adapta la noua realitate nu inseamna sa stai pe loc, sa conservi “cash-ul” si sa astepti redresarea economica. A te adapta inseamna sa fii in miscare si sa iti cunosti mai bine ca oricine altcineva clientii. Ce s-a schimbat, ce a ramas la fel? Cum poti aduce valoare fara a modifica strategia de pret a produsului?

    Asistam la o furtuna a preturilor mici in ultima perioada, iar cei din auto si din real-estate se intrec in a trece primii linia de sosire intr-o cursa in care au impresia ca va castiga cine are pretul cel mai bun. Nimic mai fals. Diferentierea prin pret inseamna “bunuri generice”. Iar daca nu ai pornit la drum cu o strategie de “cel mai mic pret” (sunt putine companiile care stiu cu adevarat sa lupte in aceasta categorie), ajustarea oportunista pe parcurs duce inevitabil catre dezastru.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel